# Update Min Staking Requirement

**URL:** <https://forum.xx.network/t/update-min-staking-requirement/7043>\
**Category:** Democracy\
**Created:** [November 20, 2024, 12:54am UTC](https://forum.xx.network/t/update-min-staking-requirement/7043 "2024-11-20T00:54:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rothbardian](https://forum.xx.network/user_avatar/forum.xx.network/rothbardian/32/818_2.png) [@rothbardian](https://forum.xx.network/u/rothbardian)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2024, 4:59pm UTC](https://forum.xx.network/t/update-min-staking-requirement/7043/6 "2024-11-21T16:59:36Z")

</div>

> [@warnings](#):
>
> The last time you decided to touch a network parameter, the price went down … due to oversupply

What change was that?

> [@warnings](#):
>
> You’re affecting what’s currently working very well - our network.

It would work just as well with 300 nodes.

And maybe it will work better, considering how this gray line with network-average earnings commission has been going lately…

 ![image](https://forum.xx.network/uploads/default/original/1X/3fd949e31a87e6092c63ec92873e17549572626e.png)

To put this in perspective:

- 370 validators take 31% of all node earnings. What about the nominators? Nominators get the rest - 69%.
- Now, let’s see: nominators nominate the 370 validators with 124 million XX for 69%. Validators have 20 million XX and take 31%.

In many cases validators and nominators are the same, but as the chart shows, the situation is not “stable” in the sense that validators take 30% more than early in the year and my [post](https://forum.xx.network/t/simple-chainalytics-for-xx-chain/7035/5) from earlier today shows how - it’s become very lucrative and tempting to serve yourself rather than the network.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.xx.network/t/update-min-staking-requirement/7043)._
