Node GPU Architecture

Is Nvidia Ampere compatible? I’m speaking about the RTX 3090.

3 Likes

Not yet.

1 Like

when can we expect the Ampere to be supported?

1 Like

Good question. Would be interesting to see results.

1 Like

Ampere will not work as from my view it requires cuda 11.0 , i just downgraded my node from cuda 11.0 to cuda 10.2 because i had a lot of failed rounds.

2 Likes

Did the downgrade help with the failure rate?

1 Like

I dont recall what version are they recommending.

1 Like

Would the RTX 3070 be suitable, or best sticking with the 2070?

1 Like

Your better of with either the 2070 or 2080.

2 Likes

I think we all are really looking forward to the support of the ampere architecture, since there are not so many 20 ** series left in warehouses
besides, 20** cards are no longer produce

Second hand market is still alive :slight_smile:
Someone need to test Cuda11.1 and RTX 30XX. Cuda 11 seem work fine until now :slight_smile:

rtx 3070 is not compartible yet?

It should be supported now, but cannot 100% guarantee.

2 Likes

it seems to be working, but I have some errors in the log

INFO 2020/12/22 13:15:47 [L4aKIGPr2ZttgWY+kiiJuPUks+ep3BBmur3TYT+Z83gC:11420 - (3/3)] RID 46990397 StreamTransmitPhase FOR “PrecompPermute” COMPLETE/SEND
WARN 2020/12/22 13:15:55 Graph PrecompDecryptGPU in module DecryptElgamalChunk timed out thread 257
WARN 2020/12/22 13:15:55 Graph PrecompDecryptGPU in module DecryptElgamalChunk timed out thread 256
INFO 2020/12/22 13:15:56 [L4aKIGPr2ZttgWY+kiiJuPUks+ep3BBmur3TYT+Z83gC:11420]: RID 46990397 StreamPostPhase FROM “PrecompReveal” TO “PrecompReveal” RECIEVE/S
TART

±----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 455.32.00 Driver Version: 455.32.00 CUDA Version: 11.1 |
|-------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
| | | MIG M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 Graphics Device Off | 00000000:08:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 57% 50C P2 56W / 270W | 1723MiB / 7981MiB | 49% Default |
| | | N/A |
±------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+

±----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: |
| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |
| ID ID Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 N/A N/A 9474 C …etwork/bin/xxnetwork-node 1721MiB |
±----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

That’s “normal”.

what about this?

[INFO] 22-Dec-20 12:07:26: /opt/xxnetwork/bin/xxnetwork-node started at PID 6978
[WARNING] 22-Dec-20 12:17:53: Restarting binary due to error…
[INFO] 22-Dec-20 12:17:53: /opt/xxnetwork/bin/xxnetwork-node started at PID 8271
[WARNING] 22-Dec-20 12:23:06: Restarting binary due to error…
[INFO] 22-Dec-20 12:23:06: /opt/xxnetwork/bin/xxnetwork-node started at PID 9288
[WARNING] 22-Dec-20 12:24:16: Restarting binary due to error…
[INFO] 22-Dec-20 12:24:16: /opt/xxnetwork/bin/xxnetwork-node started at PID 9474

Normal as well.